Plaintiffs in personal injury matters must file a lawsuit within a time
limit set by law, or else risk losing the right to any compensation at
all. This time limit is often known as a “statute of limitations,”
but some laws refer to it as a “statute of repose.” The key
difference is that a court may delay the deadline established by a statute
of limitations for various reasons, but the deadline imposed by a statute
of repose is absolute. The Maryland Court of Appeals, in
Anderson v. United States, considered the question of whether the state’s time limit for medical
malpractice cases is a statute of limitations subject to interpretation
by a court, or a statute of repose. Based on a review of the law’s
history and Maryland’s requirement that a medical malpractice plaintiff
complete an administrative process before filing suit, the court concluded
that it is a statute of limitations.
A plaintiff must file a medical malpractice lawsuit within five years of the date of the injury, or within three years of the date the injury was discovered, whichever is sooner, according to § 5-109 of the Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Code. The section does not expressly state whether it is a statute of limitations or a statute of repose, although it does use the word “limitations.”
In
Anderson, a federal court of appeals asked the Maryland Court of Appeals to interpret
§ 5-109. The plaintiff had filed a federal lawsuit alleging malpractice,
including cancer misdiagnosis and inadequate treatment, at a Baltimore
VA hospital. The plaintiff’s injuries occurred between May and December
2002, but she did not file suit until January 2008. Government attorneys
argued that the five-year time limit was a statute of repose barring her
suit. The plaintiff argued that mandatory administrative proceedings delayed
the lawsuit, and that the court should treat the time limit as a statute
of limitations and grant her an equitable exception.
Section 3-2A-04 of the Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings Code requires medical malpractice claimants to submit a claim to the
Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office before filing a lawsuit. Federal law also has administrative requirements
prior to filing suit against the government. Failure to follow these procedures
can result in delay or dismissal of a lawsuit, but the processes themselves
can take a considerable amount of time. The plaintiff in
Anderson began the federal administrative process in December 2003, and it continued
until September 2007. She argued that the court should disregard the period
of time when she was involved in the administrative proceeding when calculating
the medical malpractice time limit, a process known as “tolling.”
The Court of Appeals agreed with the plaintiff, and ruled that the time
limit is a statute of limitations subject to tolling.
Medical professionals owe a strict duty of care to their patients. When someone breaches this duty, such as through a surgical error, medication error, or misdiagnosis, the patient, or the patient’s family, has a right to compensation for injuries and other damages. Wais, Vogelstein, Forman, Koch & Norman’s medical malpractice attorneys represent the rights of Maryland patients and families, helping them to understand their rights and the often-complicated litigation system. We have obtained millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements for our clients, and we are committed to providing you with the best possible legal representation. We are available 24/7 and can visit you in your home or at the hospital. Please contact us online, at (410) 567-0800 to schedule a free and confidential consultation.